HNW - Messy wrongsides
jacquie-samples at uiowa.edu
Mon Apr 6 08:59:44 PDT 1998
I have done a little reading about this, but I haven't gotten to any
museums to see the wrongsides for myself, so this is just all conjecture,
This hypotheses, of course, does not include reversable work which on such
things as handkerchiefs and collars, etc. which were viewed from both
sides. It is my perception that the obsession with "equal neatness front
and back" didn't really come about until the Victorian age.
I have seen some photos of the reverse of pieces worked in the 16th and
17th centuries, and while these were not knotted messes, neither are they
what could be called excessively neat. Some threads are "run across" to
get to another area worked in the same color, etc., where today we would
probably end the thread and start again in the new area to avoid a messy back.
Does any one else have a different opinion about this? Also, I wonder if
those of you who "do" other lists could direct some of the
embroidery-related discussion to this list when it occurs on them? Is that
"legal," polite, or just greedy of me?
At 11:00 AM 4/6/98 -0400, you wrote:
>a long thread on h-costume about messy
>backsidesof historical needlework. We have any number of people who have
>visited museums, intern in museums,etc. and they had found a fair deal of
>messiness on the backs of needlework,thereby dispelling the myth that all
>historical needlework was perfect and/or amazingly neat on the wrong side..
>I guess it's really hard to separate garb and needlework?
>SCA: Kathryn Goodwyn
>"too many centuries...too little time"
>To be removed from the Historic Needlework mailing list, please send a
>message to Majordomo at Ansteorra.ORG with the message body of "unsubscribe
To be removed from the Historic Needlework mailing list, please send a
message to Majordomo at Ansteorra.ORG with the message body of "unsubscribe
More information about the H-needlework