ANSTHRLD - ILoAR 0398
charlene at flash.net
Thu May 14 10:58:29 PDT 1998
Wendy Erisman wrote:
> I'm glad we have the new field-only rules as they help register simple
> devices. I also like RfS X.2 which makes any simple armory that has a
> complete difference of primary charge clear of conflict. However, I would
> like to see these rules extended and two CDs granted for changes to the
> field in simple cases (like Alix's device).
When I looked it why two differences to the field weren't sufficient I was told
it had to do with cadency. I've been doing some research (recently put on hold)
on cadency in an effort to argue for a rule change. Perhaps it's about time to
dig out the research again.....
To be prepared against surprise is to be trained. To be prepared for surprise
is to be educated. --James P. Carse
Go to http://www.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.
More information about the Heralds