ANSTHRLD - What do we need to know?
Dr Tiomoid M. of Angle
tiomoid at yahoo.com
Fri Aug 20 17:19:57 PDT 1999
- --- Donald Riney <dariusobells at hotmail.com> wrote:
> Would there be any problem with just calling them "Pursuivants".
> Skipping
> the "extraordinary" or "at large" altogether? After all branch
> officers will
> be identified by their branch name or branch heraldic title. For
> example
> Lindenwood Pursuivant or Nautilus Pursuivant, where as one not
> attached to a
> group could just be a pursuivant.
That certainly does no damage to the historical paradigm. "Pursuivant"
implies that the person is not an heraldic expert, still learning, but
has a minimal amount of knowledge -- and that about descibes the sort
of people who would be put in that situation. Works for me....
Tadhg, Hanaper
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com
============================================================================
Go to http://lists.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.
More information about the Heralds
mailing list