ANSTHRLD - Re: Conflict check...
darin_herndon at bswintl.com
Tue Nov 16 16:18:00 PST 1999
Kathri, et al.,
Concerning: "I need a conflict check, please, for: Quarterly agent and azure Preferably by early Saturday morning, Nov 20, if possible. I appreciate your help." What happened to "Quarterly azure and argent"? I take it from commentary on the list that an ordinary got involved. Bordure, orle?
I have to agree with Timothy that there is a conflict with: Cathan the Tinker - Quarterly bendy sinister sable and argent and azure. There is change of tincture to one quarter of the field space and visually this looks like a cadency claim, a very close cadency claim.
I also have to agree with the Panama conflict Magnus found.
The reason I ask about the "...azure and argent" version and the ordinary is (and please educate me where necessary, I really do like learning): when comparing a device consisting only of an ordinary upon a field and it is being compared a device with only the same field then should not the two be clear by X.1 addition of a primary charge with the ordinary acting as the primary charge? Or cannot peripheral ordinaries be primary charges? (Assuming a bordure for an example) Then would not "Quarterly azure and argent" be clear of "Quarterly azure and argent, a bordure [some tincture]" by addition/removal of a primary charge?
Go to http://lists.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.
More information about the Heralds