[ANSTHRLD] Blazon help - William Killian

Tim McDaniel tmcd at panix.com
Thu Aug 15 22:40:21 PDT 2002


On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Dave Jordan <wulfgar at hot.rr.com> wrote:
> I thought a canton was illegal?

I presume that's true: you thought that a canton was illegal.

However, cantons are perfectly legal on their own.  By Table 1 in the
COA Glossary of Terms, a *charged* canton is *reserved* for people who
have received an augmentation of arms.

In period terms, I think that that's bogus -- at least a canton
charged with one widget is not uncommon from the earliest times.
Nevertheless, that's the current ruling.

Daniel de Lincolia
--
Tim McDaniel (home); Reply-To: tmcd at panix.com; work is tmcd at us.ibm.com.




More information about the Heralds mailing list