[ANSTHRLD] complete change of field??

[Cahira]

That is the total blazon. Both are "field primary"
armory.

--- Mór_ingen_Cathail <morcathail at hotmail.com> wrote:
> no that is a CD for [significant] change of field
> color
> However, it also depends on the charges on it...
> if that is the total blazon on the device, it would
> be clear via X.2(?) on
> the RfS I think.
>
> Mór
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Cahira" <cahira_of_bonwicke at yahoo.com>
> To: <heralds at ansteorra.org>
> Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 7:44 AM
> Subject: [ANSTHRLD] complete change of field??
>
>
> > If on a device using "per pall" or "per pall
> inverted"
> > it shares a tincture with another device, but in a
> > different position, is it a complete change of
> field?
> >
> > For instance, would "Per pall inverted purpure,
> sable
> > and Or" conflict with "Per pall inverted sable,
> > argent, and chevronelly gules and argent"?
> >
> > Cahira
> > Asterisk
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs
> > http://www.hotjobs.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > Heralds mailing list
> > Heralds at ansteorra.org
> > http://www.ansteorra.org/mailman/listinfo/heralds
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Heralds mailing list
> Heralds at ansteorra.org
> http://www.ansteorra.org/mailman/listinfo/heralds


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs
http://www.hotjobs.com