[ANSTHRLD] sorry
Jim Trigg
blaise at scadian.net
Sun Apr 11 19:03:04 PDT 2004
--On Sunday, April 11, 2004 9:38 PM -0400 Dmitrii1200 at aol.com wrote:
> Sorry new to this here is the link
> http://www.geocities.com/freaks252798/Devices_bagdes.html
#1: Per chevron argent and checky sable and argent, a chevron enhanced
purpure beneath in fess a crescent between two wolves sejant respectant
sable. The chevron enhanced with nothing beneath it is poor style and may
be returnable.
#2: Gyronny azure and sable, a natural tiger's head (?) argent. This
violates RFS VIII.2.b.iv (elements evenly divided into multiple parts
[except quarterly and per saltire] of two different tinctures must have
good contrast between their parts).
#3: Unfortunately, the arrangement of the suns is unblazonable. Sable, a
bear rampant and to dexter three suns in an unblazonable arrangement, a
bordure Or.
#4: Sable, on a bend sinister cotised between two quills bendwise sinister
argent four inkwells sable. I think this one is registerable style, but
have not conflict checked. I will be interested in arguments for and
against it qualifying for X.2 and X.4.j.ii -- are cotises the same type of
charge as the charge they accompany for the purpose of these rules?
Blaise
--
Jim Trigg, Lord High Everything Else O- /"\
SKA Seigneur Blaise de Cormeilles \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
Silver Nautilus Pursuivant, Atlantia X HELP CURE HTML MAIL
Webmaster, Academy of S. Gabriel / \
More information about the Heralds
mailing list