[ANSTHRLD] question about counterchanging

[Joe Percer]

And I just get Master Daniel's email saying that it is too complex. So
I'll re-do my question, when they say simple geometric charges, are we
speaking solely of ordinaries?

Jayme

> Oooh! I see a good opportunity to ask a question!
>
> I know you cannot fimbriate a complex charge, per RfS VIII.3 s "Voiding
> and fimbriation may only be used with simple geometric charges placed in
> the center of the design."
>
> Does a trefoil knot count as a simple geometric charge? I'm still learning
> on how conservative to be when making these sort of decisions, and I don't
> have time to dig through precedents to see what all is being
> returned/registered.
>
> Jayme
>
> ---------------------------
>
>
>> Greetings!
>>
>> 	I had a request for opinions on whether or not a trefoil knot on per
>> saltier, counterchanged, would ever pass. I don't know if I am posting
>> this
>> to the wrong area. Sorry if I am. I am still pretty new at this. I would
>> think that it would come back at us for excessive counterchange or non
>> period elements, but I just don't know so I thought I would ask. I have
>> done
>> some quick mock ups of different ideas and posted them at the link
>> below.
>> The one that Dante really wants to register is at the top left. Is this
>> design even possible? I think it would be "sable and vert per saltier, a
>> trefoil knot inverted (over all?) counterchanged and fimbriated or".
>> <-----
>> off top of my head. don't even know if it would conflict~ if it could be
>> done. (bottom left with ermine?)
>> http://www.geocities.com/lann_de_wylde/index.html
>>
>> Your opinions are appreciated.
>> Lann "the rookie" de Wylde~
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Heralds mailing list
>> Heralds at ansteorra.org
>> http://www.ansteorra.org/mailman/listinfo/heralds
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Heralds mailing list
> Heralds at ansteorra.org
> http://www.ansteorra.org/mailman/listinfo/heralds
>