[ANSTHRLD] (ANSTHRLD) conflict check

[Brent Ryder]

>>
>>Argent a horse rampant sable in chief and three roses gules?
>
>The blazon above is not legal (you don't blazon peripheral charges
>before primary charges), but as best I can figure out:
>
>There's a white field.  On it are three large red roses arranged
>two-and-one centered on the shield.  Between and a bit up from the top two 
>rosies is a little tiny black horse.

Personally, I took it as a mis-type and the blazon should just remove the 
'and' to be correct:

"Argent, a horse rampant sable, in chief three roses gules"

A picture would tell us if the roses are 'gules' or 'proper'

Borek the pedantic