[ANSTHRLD] simple armory

tmcd@panix.com tmcd at panix.com
Fri Aug 11 22:26:01 PDT 2006

On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, Paul E. Kiefer, Jr. <rapierman at yahoo.com> wrote:
> --- tmcd at panix.com wrote:
> > You should choose the easiest way to clear conflict.  Most often,
> > that's using RfS X.2 (substantial difference in type), but sometimes
> > RfS X.4 (CD counting) is the easy way.
> Remembering, of course, that the original example was 'two dolphins'
> vs. 'tower and dolphin',

Actually, the original example was the one I quoted:
>> >     Per bend Or and vert two dolphins counter-changed
>> > would not conflict with
>> >     Per bend Or and vert two towers counter changed
>> > or
>> >     Per bend Or and vert two butterflies counter-changed

"Two dolphins" versus "tower and dolphin" was a later example, from
Emma I think.

> we start to run into problems.  1 CD since changing the type of at
> least half of the charge group creates the difference, per RfS
> X.4.e.  However, since X.2 requires that the type of EVERY primary
> charge is changed, this fails because we changed only one of the
> charges, not both.

For the later example, that's quite correct, and good on ya for citing
the exact rules.

Danyll Lincoln
Tim McDaniel; Reply-To: tmcd at panix.com

More information about the Heralds mailing list