[ANSTHRLD] simple armory

[Alasdair MacEogan]

My understanding is if the type of charge is substantially changed (as they are in your example) then they do not conflict.

The key is "substantially changed".  The example they give of charges that would not be substantially different is Oak trees and fir trees.  

Alasdair

>  -------Original Message-------
>  From: Luciana Caterina di Boniface <dolce.luce at gmail.com>
>  Subject: Re: [ANSTHRLD] simple armory
>  Sent: 11 Aug '06 08:01
>  
>  I am still learning also. I 'think' I am only seeing 1 CD between them,
>  though. :( I am going to be very interested in seeing what the more
>  experienced heralds have to say.
>  
>  Luciana
>  
>  
>  On 8/11/06, Hedwig von Luneborg <lochherald at gmail.com> wrote:
>  >
>  > In trying to grasp the simple armory rules of RfS X.2 am I wrong in
>  > understanding that :
>  > Per bend Or and vert two dolphins counter-changed
>  > would not conflict with
>  >
>  > Per bend Or and vert two towers counter changed
>  > or
>  > Per bend Or and vert two butterflies counter-changed
>  > because the charge groups are different
>  >
>  > or do I misunderstand this rule altogether?
>  >
>  > Thank you,
>  >
>  >
>  > --
>  > Hedwig
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > Nobody can make you feel inferior without your permission.
>  >         -Eleanor Roosevelt-
>  > _______________________________________________
>  > Heralds mailing list
>  > Heralds at lists.ansteorra.org
>  > http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/heralds-ansteorra.org
>  >
>  
>  
>  
>  --
>  Always assume the best about your loved ones. There is a reason that you
>  love them
>  _______________________________________________
>  Heralds mailing list
>  Heralds at lists.ansteorra.org
>  http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/heralds-ansteorra.org
>