[ANSTHRLD] Help needed on a Conflict check on a badge

[Luciana Caterina di Boniface]

That is my understanding of what is wanted, I just did not have the proper
wording. Thank you for clarifying this and giving the correct phrasing! I
will double-check and make certain that I am understanding my
client properly. I have only gotten a verbal description at this point (long
story). This has been the desired badge for some time, and I agreed to
conflict check the badge before we go any further with it. He does have a
graphic image of the badge to send me as soon as I give him the go ahead.

Luciana


On 10/2/06, Jennifer Smith <jds at randomgang.com> wrote:
>
> Insta-boing. RfS VIII.5 says:
>
> 5. Fieldless Style. - Fieldless armory must form a self-contained design.
>
> A fieldless design must have all its elements conjoined, like the three
> feathers issuing from a crown used by the Heir Apparent to the throne of
> England. Since there is no field in such a design, it may not use charges
> that rely on the edges of the field to define their shape, such as
> bordures
> and orles, nor to cut off their ends, such as ordinaries or charges
> throughout.
>
>
> ...so no bordure, and no "within an annulet" either, unless it's touching
> (in which case it's "within and conjoined to an annulet").
>
> -Emma