[ANSTHRLD] Help needed on a Conflict check on a badge

[Mike C. Baker]

> Would this be considered touching enough to be "within and 
> conjoined to an annulet"?
> 
> http://www.geocities.com/elfsea_herald/Devices/Arthur-Badge-Annulo.gif
> 
> Thank you for the help,
> Luciana
> 
> 
> On 10/2/06, Jennifer Smith <jds at randomgang.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > ...so no bordure, and no "within an annulet" either, unless it's 
> > touching (in which case it's "within and conjoined to an annulet").

Highly doubtful.

If, instead, the primary pad of the pawprint were in significant contact
with the lower portion of the annulet, far more likely.
(In My Opinion.)

Amra / Kihe / Mike