[ANSTHRLD] Asterisk moving this weekend!

[radei at moscowmail.com]

Here is the text of the appeal.  I will send Hard-Copy as soon as I can get to the USPS.  hope it helps.

thank you for your interest.


> Unto the Ansteorra College of Heralds
>  From Radei Drchevich
> 
> Greetings!
> 
> In the July 2007 Ansteorran Gazette, on page 11 (column 3) my device
> submission was returned.
> The Gazette noted:
> 
> Radei Drchevich. (Namron)
> Device: Quarterly, gules and argent, on a large lozenge throughout
> sable a mullet of four points Or.
> 
> Kingdom Action: Returned for conflict with Paul of Sunriver, "Azure, a
> compass star Or" with only one CD for the field, but nothing for the
> difference between a mullet of four points and a compass star.
> 
> 
> I would like to request an appeal of this decision based on the
> following:
> 
> The blazon for my device is:
> Quarterly gules and argent, on a lozenge throughout sable a mullet of
> four points Or.
> 
> In the device of Paul of Sunriver, the primary charge is a compass
> star.  In my proposed device, the primary charge is a lozenge
> (throughout). The mullet of four is a tertiary charge on the lozenge.
> Thus these two designs are clear by RfS X.2. which states, "Simple
> armory does not conflict with other simple armory if the type of every
> primary charge is substantially changed." and "For purposes of this
> rule, simple armory is defined as armory that has no more than two types
> of charge directly on the field and has no overall charges."  As neither
> my design or Paul of Sunriver's armory  has more than two types of
> charges that lie directly on the field and neither has an overall
> charge, this rule should apply.  Secondly, even if one were to need to
> go ahead and count CDs between the two, there is a CD for the difference
> in the fields (azure vs quarterly gules and argent), a CD for difference
> in type of primary charge (compass star vs lozenge) and a CD for the
> addition of a tertiary charge (none vs mullet of four).  Finally,
> barring evidence that a field may be vetu quarterly, we must interpret
> this as a sable lozenge on a quarterly gules and argent field, and not
> as "Sable vetu quarterly gules and argent..." and thus the
> aforementioned rules would apply.
> 
> We kindly ask that the Ansteorran College of Herald reconsider the
> return, and forward the submission on to Laurel.  Thank you for your
> time and consideration in this matter.
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> Radei Drchevich

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: tmcd at panix.com
> To: "Heralds List, Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA,  Inc." <heralds at lists.ansteorra.org>
> Subject: Re: [ANSTHRLD] Asterisk moving this weekend!
> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:06:16 -0500 (CDT)
> 
> 
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, radei at moscowmail.com wrote:
> > My appeal was written by 4 heralds, not by me.  So it is well worded
> > and sites precedence in good order.
> 
> ("cites precedents".)  I'm still curious.
> 
> Danielis Lindum Colonia
> --
> Tim McDaniel; Reply-To: tmcd at panix.com
> _______________________________________________
> Heralds mailing list
> Heralds at lists.ansteorra.org
> http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/heralds-ansteorra.org

>



Radei
Vasil House of the Red Shark
Guild of St. Camillus de Lellis

This we know: All things are connected.
Like the blood which unites one family,
All things are connected.
Whatever befalls the earth,
Befalls the sons of the earth.
Man did not weave the fabric of life,
He is merely a strand on it.

- Chief Seattle




-- 
We've Got Your Name at http://www.mail.com !
Get a FREE E-mail Account Today - Choose From 100+ Domains