[ANSTHRLD] Radei Drchevich appeal
tmcd at panix.com
tmcd at panix.com
Thu Aug 23 21:40:36 PDT 2007
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, kevinkeary at aol.com wrote:
> I think I'd still prefer a position of "A field vetu is ALWAYS
> translated to the equivalent blazon of a lozenge throughout and
> NEVER considered a field treatment", but I don't see that
> happening.
Normalizing blazons can be helpful, and we often do it. In this case,
you could end up with a blazon that would appear to make the design
unregisterable -- or, worse, the reblazon would cause a bounce.
Example:
Argent, on a lozenge throughout sable an owl Or charged with a
pheon gules.
is four layers, which would be cause for return. The identical
Sable v{e^}tu argent, on an owl Or a pheon gules.
is not.
Danyell de Linccolne
--
Tim McDaniel; Reply-To: tmcd at panix.com
More information about the Heralds
mailing list