[ANSTHRLD] OP question - Court Baronies and Baronies in fief

[Morgan Buchanan]

Actually, this point makes me re-consider Daniel's point.  :)  Now I think it's invalid.  :)
 
We don't actually record past kings and queens.  We may have a list of them, but if you look at a past king it only shows the date of his county or duchy, but if he reigned more than twice, there is no notation.
We show all AWARDS on the OP even if they're non-precedence...  KBC, Lion, sable falcon.... because they're still awards.
 
But a person's time as a Baron in Fief isn't an award.   Just like a person's time as King isn't an award.
 
Ergo, it shouldn't be listed in the OP.
 
Just my thought.
 
Morgan
 



> Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 13:51:21 -0600> From: siortomas at gmail.com> To: heralds at lists.ansteorra.org> Subject: Re: [ANSTHRLD] OP question - Court Baronies and Baronies in fief> > Makes one wonder though. Why do we record Lions, or any of our awards that> have no precedence.> > On 1/2/07, Tim McDaniel <tmcd at panix.com> wrote:> >> > On Tue, 2 Jan 2007, Morgan Buchanan <morganbuchanan at hotmail.com> wrote:> > > Well, if they weren't made B of the Court after their step down, it> > > has no impact on the OP, so there is no notation.> >> > I believe that the Roll of Precedence also records some offices, such> > as previous kings and queens, Queen's Champion, Kingdom Bard, et> > cetera. In my opinion, landed barons and baronesses ought to be> > recorded too.> >> > Danielis de Lincolino> > --> > Tim McDaniel, tmcd at panix.com> > _______________________________________________> > Heralds mailing list> > Heralds at lists.ansteorra.org> > http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/heralds-ansteorra.org> >> _______________________________________________> Heralds mailing list> Heralds at lists.ansteorra.org> http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/heralds-ansteorra.org