[ANSTHRLD] OP question - Court Baronies and Baronies in fief
tmcd at panix.com
tmcd at panix.com
Sun Jan 7 15:13:54 PST 2007
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, Darin Herndon <DHerndon at chkenergy.com> wrote:
> Strictly speaking, a Roll should only include mention of items that
> actually affect rank/precedence.
I would like to argue that it would be nice if it also recorded items
that used to affect rank/precedence -- that is, so earlier Rolls of
Precedence can be deduced. If so, it is reasonable to record details
of previous royals and landeds.
Dankyn de Linccolne
--
Tim McDaniel; Reply-To: tmcd at panix.com
More information about the Heralds
mailing list