[ANSTHRLD] OP question - Court Baronies and Baronies in fief

[tmcd at panix.com]

On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, Darin Herndon <DHerndon at chkenergy.com> wrote:
> Strictly speaking, a Roll should only include mention of items that
> actually affect rank/precedence.

I would like to argue that it would be nice if it also recorded items
that used to affect rank/precedence -- that is, so earlier Rolls of
Precedence can be deduced.  If so, it is reasonable to record details
of previous royals and landeds.

Dankyn de Linccolne
-- 
Tim McDaniel; Reply-To: tmcd at panix.com