[ANSTHRLD] Fw: Re: Question about per chevron rayonee sable and gules.

[Alasdair MacEogan]

Sorry.  i actually meant for this to go to the list.


>  -------Original Message-------
>  From: Alasdair MacEogan <alasdair at bmhanson.net>
>  Subject: Re: [ANSTHRLD] Question about per chevron rayonee sable and gules.
>  Sent: 27 Jun '07 08:26
>  
>  From: Britt <tierna.britt at gmail.com>
>  
>  >  Fix the point of the field division so it's a single rayon and not a
>  >  quasi-flame.  Right now it looks weird. :)
>  
>  I agree, but then again I did not draw it. ;-)
>  
>  >  Of course you may.  Start with the RfS: VIII.2.iii. Elements evenly
>  >  divided into two parts, per saltire, or quarterly may use any two
>  >  tinctures or furs.
>  >  
>  >  Complex line or no complex line, it's divided into two equal parts and
>  >  may use two colors.
>  
>  Except there are precedents stating that some lines can not be used with some tincture combinations. (Purpure and sable for instance).  i was tryign to see if i had missed something with sable and gules.
>  
>  >  A complex line is fine between two tinctures of the same class
>  >  provided it is not overlain or obscured by charges across it.
>  
>  That is what i believed, thanks for the confirmation.
>    
>  >  No conflicts, either.  Not even Chabi of Burkhan Khaldun - October of
>  >  1995 (via Atlantia): Per bend sinister sable and vert, a reremouse
>  >  argent.
>  >  Anyone care to tell us why there's no conflict?
>  
>  hmm.
>  
>  1 cd for partition line changing and one cd for the tincture changes of the field?
>  
>  Alasdair
>