[ANSTHRLD] A question about flowers

[Alasdair MacEogan]

Yep you are right.  I am not sure why but i read the blazons several time and I still missed the sable after the roses...   Sorry.  That explains my confusion.  Carry on, nothing to see here.


>  -------Original Message-------
>  From: Britt <tierna.britt at gmail.com>
>  Subject: Re: [ANSTHRLD] A question about flowers
>  Sent: 13 Nov '07 15:16
>  
>  On Nov 13, 2007 1:01 PM, Alasdair MacEogan <alasdair at bmhanson.net> wrote:
>  > Britt <tierna.britt at gmail.com> wrote:
>  > >  > > (Argent, a chevron cotised gules between three oak leaves
>  > >  > > sable.) followed by another accepted 3 months later (Argent,
>  > >  > > a chevron cotised gules between three roses sable barbed and
>  > >  > > seeded proper.) that doesn't seem to have 2 CDs.
>  > >
>  
>  > Hmm.  Why does it not get one for the tincture of the secondaries (RfS X.4.d) (oak leaves are vert and roses gules) and a second for the type of the secondary (RfS X.4.e)?
>  
>  Re-read the blazons.  In both cases the secondaries are sable.
>  
>  - Teceangl
>