[ANSTHRLD] clear or not?

[Ron Knight]

Sorry, I didn't get everything in before I hit the send button.
I know the example listed, "Per pale nebuly ermine and gules 
has one clear difference from Per pale nebuly gules and ermine"
shows us there is a CD for the per pale...but the way this is
written, it does not clearly state it.  I think the rules should 
have "There is a clear difference for reversing the tinctures 
of a field evenly divided into two parts, per pale, per saltire, 
or quarterly, but not for..."
.
Modar

>>> "Ron Knight" <Rknight at kumc.edu> 5/30/2008 9:38 AM >>>

RfS X.4.a. Field Difference states, *Significantly changing the
tinctures, direction of partition lines, style of partition lines, or
number of pieces in a partition of the field is one clear difference.*
And then, *In general, if the tincture of at least half the field is
changed, the fields will be considered different* but also states,
*There is a clear difference for reversing the tinctures of a field
evenly divided into two parts, per saltire, or quarterly, but not for
reversing the tinctures of a field divided in any other way**.isn't this
then saying the two parts switched counts only as a CD for per saltire
and quarterly but does not include per pale as being a difference?
.
Modar