[ANSTHRLD] Heraldic Heirs

[Alasdair MacEogan]

Marie de Blois <erminespot at gmail.com> wrote:
>  No need to be snippy - I misread 'device' where you wrote 'armory'.
>  Given that 'armory includes both devices and badges, it is still worth
>  noting that the branch -device- couldn't be transferred, even if
>  badges could be.

My apologies.  I was not trying to be snippy.  I was merely trying to emphasize the word.  I guess I could have said _device_ but I am not sure you would have taken that any differently.  Again my apologies if it was read as such.

>  It would be interesting to see if Laurel would even accept such a
>  heraldic will, though personally, I'd think it was presumptuous and
>  tacky.  What's the harm in letting the kingdom hold onto them?  They
>  can't be released without some significant work.

I see no harm nor have any real reason for asking other than academic curiosity.  I was curious.  The Admin Handbook does not specify one way or the other.  It merely refers to the "owner" of the registered item.  I apologize if my curiosity offended anyone. 

Alasdair