[ANSTHRLD] a couple questions
alasdair at bmhanson.net
Wed Jul 22 20:51:31 PDT 2009
John Atkinson <johnmatkinson at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Alasdair MacEogan<alasdair at bmhanson.net> wrote:
> > John Atkinson <johnmatkinson at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Ditto for strongholds, ports, and colleges. This is Kingdom law, not
> >> corpora. Corpora does require baronies for cantons.
> > Section III.C or Corpora. "Branch Designations" says "Canton: local branch reporting through a barony"
> Right. I'm agreeing.
Hmm. For some reason the first few times I read it my mind inserted NOT after Corpora does. Sorry for my confusion. I even reread several times and still "saw" it there.
> >Nor do I see anywhere in Kingdom Law that says they need to be "formed under the protection of a barony" as cantons are. I would be interested in knowing where you saw that for my own clarification and edification.
> The Crown may recognize an institutional branch, usually centered around a
> university or military base and formed under the protection of a barony or
> province, whose membership may fluctuate.
Hmm. Learn something new everyday. i guess i can understand why they dd, but...
More information about the Heralds