[ANSTHRLD] a couple questions

Alasdair MacEogan alasdair at bmhanson.net
Wed Jul 22 20:51:31 PDT 2009

John Atkinson <johnmatkinson at gmail.com> wrote:
>  On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Alasdair MacEogan<alasdair at bmhanson.net> wrote:
>  > John Atkinson <johnmatkinson at gmail.com> wrote:
>  >>  Ditto for strongholds, ports, and colleges.  This is Kingdom law, not
>  >>  corpora.  Corpora does require baronies for cantons.
>  >
>  > Section III.C or Corpora.  "Branch Designations"  says "Canton: local branch reporting through a barony"
>  Right.  I'm agreeing.

Hmm.  For some reason the first few times I read it my mind inserted NOT after Corpora does.  Sorry for my confusion.  I even reread several times and still "saw" it there.

>  >Nor do I see anywhere in Kingdom Law that says they need to be "formed under the protection of a barony" as cantons are.  I would be interested in knowing where you saw that for my own clarification and edification.
>  VIII.5.A
>  The Crown may recognize an institutional branch, usually centered around a
>  university or military base and formed under the protection of a barony or
>  province, whose membership may fluctuate.
Hmm.  Learn something new everyday.  i guess i can understand why they dd, but...


More information about the Heralds mailing list