[ANSTHRLD] a couple questions

[Mike Wyvill]

And mentioning Shires begs the question:

 

Why isn't the seneschal of such a group a Sheriff?

 

EdV






 EMAILING FOR THE GREATER GOOD
Join me


 
> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 08:24:13 -0700
> From: alden_drake at sbcglobal.net
> To: heralds at lists.ansteorra.org
> Subject: Re: [ANSTHRLD] a couple questions
> 
> They are separate and for business purposes independantly operated, but still tied to the sheltering barony.  You can't be a canton without a sheltering barony - those are shires.  If the canton is ever disolved, the associated zip codes and membership numbers revert back to the barony (I believe without issue), whereas shires/provinces would require the Kingdom Seneschal to reallocate zip codes to nearby groups.
> 
> Alden
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: "kevinkeary at aol.com" <kevinkeary at aol.com>
> To: heralds at lists.ansteorra.org
> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 9:51:32 AM
> Subject: Re: [ANSTHRLD] a couple questions
> 
> Sure, but IS a canton 'contained within' its barony? I understood that once it was past incipient status it had to have its own separate bank account, and before that its membership tally was no longer included within the barony's, so the barony had to have sufficient membership to remain a barony WITHOUT the canton before the canton could even become incipient. Besides being geographically distinct/distinguishable.
> 
> Am I wrong about that? I don't care much -- I still carry Chemin Noir in Northkeep's OP, for instance.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tmcd at panix.com
> Sent: Wed, Jul 22, 2009 8:45 am
> Subject: Re: [ANSTHRLD] a couple questions
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, 22 Jul 2009, rbculver at sbcglobal.net <heralds at lists.ansteorra.org> wrote:
> > I thought that some of the early Norman and Plantagenet kings were
> > listed in such fashion: King of England, Duke of Normandy, County of
> > Anjou, etc.
> 
> Thank you for pointing out a period example of use of multiple landed
> titles.  But in distinction from the SCA "Baron of X, Lord of Y"
> (where Y is a canton contained within X), the Plantagenets' England,
> Normandy, Anjou, Maine, Aquitaine, Ireland, et cetera, did not
> overlap.
> 
> Daniel de Lindecolina
> --
> Tim McDaniel; Reply-To: tmcd at panix.com
> _______________________________________________
> Heralds mailing list
> Heralds at lists.ansteorra.org
> http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/heralds-ansteorra.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Heralds mailing list
> Heralds at lists.ansteorra.org
> http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/heralds-ansteorra.org
> _______________________________________________
> Heralds mailing list
> Heralds at lists.ansteorra.org
> http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/heralds-ansteorra.org