[ANSTHRLD] Arms of the Coronet
kevinkeary at aol.com
kevinkeary at aol.com
Wed Jul 22 12:41:08 PDT 2009
Thank you, Daniel.
Given that, my first impulse was to suggest that we suggest to the
Crown that the consort and heir arms be released. But that would
invalidate existing artifacts, including the Queen's Throne(s).
Still, I think I will offer my client the option of using the king's
arms with a red label overall to represent the prince, and perhaps the
queen's differenced the same way for the princess, as well as the
e-pictures I hope to get from Ragged Staff.
Is the last week in an office always one of the busiest?? (That's
rhetorical.)
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim McDaniel <tmcd at panix.com>
Sent: Wed, Jul 22, 2009 2:28 pm
Subject: Re: [ANSTHRLD] Arms of the Coronet
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009, kevinkeary at aol.com wrote:
> tmcd at panix.com:
>> Laurel has an official preference for the kingdom arms with a
>> label.
>
> Seriously? Why register differenced arms for the Coronet then?
We don't any more. Forbidden in the December 2003 LoAR Cover Letter.
<http://heraldry.sca.org/loar/2003/12/03-12cl.html>
More information about the Heralds
mailing list