[ANSTHRLD] Chronological list of groups
Donnchadh Beag mac Griogair
donnchadh at cornelius.norman.ok.us
Fri Nov 6 08:38:51 PST 2009
Good info. Doesn't change the order in this case since they're still
the last elevated, but if we get another barony, then it will certainly
make a difference.
Thanks,
Donnchadh
Tim McDaniel wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Nov 2009, Donnchadh Beag mac Griogair
> <donnchadh at cornelius.norman.ok.us> wrote:
>> I would guess that the provence comes after the baronies
>
> Why? Corpora III.C <http://sca.org/docs/pdf/govdocs.pdf> says
>
> C. Branch Designations
>
> The designations given below are considered standard, and their
> use for branches of the appropriate type needs no special
> justification: ...
>
> * Province: equivalent of barony without ceremonial representative
> ...
>
> Later:
>
> 2. Lateral changes in branch designation (such as between barony
> and province or between shire and college) ...
>
> and later still
>
> 5. Baronies and Provinces: Baronies and provinces are large
> branches within and subject to the administration of a kingdom
> (or principality, if any). They are alike in status and in the
> ability to administer other branches within their borders, but
> differ in that baronies possess a Baron and/or Baroness,
> ceremonial representatives appointed by the Crown, and
> therefore have the ability to create and administer awards,
> while provinces do not. ...
>
> I think that any province should rank among the baronies.
>
> Dannet de Lyncoln
More information about the Heralds
mailing list