[ANSTHRLD] Jbrandl10 conflict check/blazon

[Jacquie Ziegler]

Jacquie Ziegler wrote:
> Tim McDaniel wrote:
>> On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Alasdair MacEogan <alasdair at bmhanson.net> wrote:
>>> RfS VIII.3 "3. Armorial Identifiability" states "Voiding and
>>> fimbriation may only be used with simple geometric charges placed in
>>> the center of the design".
>>
>> I've had the impression that that refers to charged *on the field*,
>> but I cannot quickly find a precedent.
>>
>>> I will give you that you meet the center of the shield
>>> qualification, but I have been unable (after a brief run through) to
>>> find a precedent regarding if a Thor's hammer may be fimbriated.
>>
>> The defining precedent is the Nov 1992 cover letter, but the on-line
>> copy doesn't have the crucial example illustrations and the illos in
>> <http://heraldry.sca.org/laurel/precedents/bruce/bruce.html#fimbriation>
>> look mangled in my browser: I see the top half of Fig. A, all of
>> Fig. B, and none of Fig. C. In Internet Exploder, I get a little more
>> of each, oddly enough. CCing Shauna, Ragged Staff Herald, in case she
>> has a scan handy.
>>
>> Danyell de Lincoln
> Huh? *blinks* Oh, you want me to look up the precedents page and see 
> what the illustrations look like?
>
> Sure. Give me a little bit and I'll have that available - where should 
> I post it?
>
> Shauna
I have the page from the November 1992 Cover Letter scanned, and cropped 
out and blew up the requested
illustrations. Got someplace I can send the result?

Shauna