[ANSTHRLD] Conflict check help, please?

[Bob Wade]

With only two charges on the field (pale and bordure) and with the tertiary lying on a voidable charge (pale) this is simple armory under RfS X.4j(ii), which means only a change of type is necessary from the decrescent Or to be a CD.
 
Seems clear, including versus "Argent, on a pale sable a rose argent, a bordure gules." (Anne Meckil von Salm, Device, May 2004) and "Or, on a pale sable a fleur-de-lys argent, all within a bordure sable." (Adam Antoine Gabrial Dante, Device, Dec 1984).
 
Reminiscent of, but also clear versus two important pieces of armory in Ansteorra "Or, on a pale sable a mullet of five greater and five lesser points Or and overall a laurel wreath vert." (Canton of Chemin Noir, Device, Oct 2005) and "Or, on a pale sable endorsed vert an oak leaf inverted Or." (Barony of the Steppes, Badge for the 'Order of the Oak', Jan 1981).
 
Tostig

--- On Wed, 6/30/10, Emily Minier <adalia.nyx at gmail.com> wrote:


From: Emily Minier <adalia.nyx at gmail.com>
Subject: [ANSTHRLD] Conflict check help, please?
To: "Heralds List, Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc." <heralds at lists.ansteorra.org>
Date: Wednesday, June 30, 2010, 12:16 PM


As I'm still learning conflict checking, please can I have another set of
eyes review this one?

Or, on a pale sable a decrescent Or within a bordure gules.

-- 
HL Adalia VonderBerg
Titled Bard of Vatavia, Calontir
Skald of Skorragardr
Herald of Northkeep
Apprentice to Sir Finn Kelley O'Donnell


Music expresses that which cannot be put into words, but also cannot remain
unsaid.
_______________________________________________
Heralds mailing list
Heralds at lists.ansteorra.org
http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/heralds-ansteorra.org