[ANSTHRLD] Conflicting with a non player.

[Wendel Bordelon]

Ok,  I am bored at work... which often means trouble....

On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Kevinkeary <kevinkeary at aol.com> wrote:

> ... Not to mention my original statement about the moral / ethical
> implications of taking someone's duly-purchased property back by fiat
> because you don't feel they're using it (or CAN use it) enough.
>

 duly-purchased property?

They paid a fee to register a name and/or armory.  If it was accepted it was
registered and recorded in the big book of blazons.

The CoA will provide some measure of protection against presumption of
implied relationship between the registered armory and any future
registrations (in accordance with the current RfS). Mistakes do sometimes
happen and direct conflict do get registered.  They will then both reside in
the big book of blazon because once registered always registered (unless
released by the owner or the Board takes action).

Other than moral arguments about registered armory being protected there is
nothing Laurel Sovereign of Arms can do if someone wanted to display any bit
of registered armory with a single difference, or even no difference.

--Francois, heraldic heretic