[ANSTHRLD] Field Primary Conflict Check

[Tim McDaniel]

Per pale indented argent and azure.

versus Peregrine Gray|200903W|d|Per pale indented bendy barry Or and
azure and gules.

On Tue, 2 Nov 2010, Jennifer Smith <jds at randomgang.com> wrote:
> By that reasoning, it should be clear of Peregrine Grey under
> "complete change of tincture".  See the following precedent from
> Francois II:

At least at one time, "complete change of tincture" did not apply in
these cases: it wasn't interpreted as "every pixel changes" (for
example, that would clear "Per pale azure and Or" versus "Per pale Or
and azure"), but it was instead interpreted as "no tincture in one
coat appears in the other".  Though that may have been overturned
since.

Also, the rulings you quoted did not mention "complete change of
tincture", which instantly clears the two pieces regardless of CDs,
but instead counted CDs.

That said: unless those precedents have been overruled, they are good
illustrations of why the two designs are clear.  Thank you.

Danyell de Lincoln
-- 
Tim McDaniel, tmcd at panix.com