[ANSTHRLD] Conflicting with a non player.

Joseph Percer jpercer at gmail.com
Fri Nov 12 12:32:10 PST 2010


I kinda gotta agree with Master Francois, that I don't feel that this
is necessarily "property" --

Your Registration fee covers the following:

8 dollars you give to the local: He keeps 1$ for the local group's
processing (mailing, any additional tweaks or copies)
7 dollars to Kingdom, which scoops 4$ off the top and keeps that for processing
(including mailing the packet, printing any needed documentation or
copies of forms, printing out
any letters of intent (though we've now gone to OSCAR),
3 Dollars to Laurel for their processing, which includes making the
commentary, distributing the loar
and maintaining the files and supporting archival operations...

I'm sure that Francois can expound on profit/loss but the money is
really nothing more (nor do I believe
anybody can reasonably characterize it as such) than a processing fee.

Jayme
Bordure

On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Wendel Bordelon <rwbordelon at gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok,  I am bored at work... which often means trouble....
>
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Kevinkeary <kevinkeary at aol.com> wrote:
>
>> ... Not to mention my original statement about the moral / ethical
>> implications of taking someone's duly-purchased property back by fiat
>> because you don't feel they're using it (or CAN use it) enough.
>>
>
>  duly-purchased property?
>
> They paid a fee to register a name and/or armory.  If it was accepted it was
> registered and recorded in the big book of blazons.
>
> The CoA will provide some measure of protection against presumption of
> implied relationship between the registered armory and any future
> registrations (in accordance with the current RfS). Mistakes do sometimes
> happen and direct conflict do get registered.  They will then both reside in
> the big book of blazon because once registered always registered (unless
> released by the owner or the Board takes action).
>
> Other than moral arguments about registered armory being protected there is
> nothing Laurel Sovereign of Arms can do if someone wanted to display any bit
> of registered armory with a single difference, or even no difference.
>
> --Francois, heraldic heretic
> _______________________________________________
> Heralds mailing list
> Heralds at lists.ansteorra.org
> http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/heralds-ansteorra.org
>



-- 
Joseph M. Percer, AAS, LP



More information about the Heralds mailing list