[ANSTHRLD] conflict check - natural panther rampant

Crandall crandalltwo-scalists at yahoo.com
Thu Aug 18 16:46:36 PDT 2011


Pheons or Broadarrows? 

Crandall


"In all life one should comfort the afflicted, but verily, also, one should afflict the comfortable, and especially when they are comfortably, contentedly, even happily wrong." -John Kenneth Galbraith


--- On Thu, 8/18/11, Kevinkeary <kevinkeary at aol.com> wrote:

> From: Kevinkeary <kevinkeary at aol.com>
> Subject: Re: [ANSTHRLD] conflict check - natural panther rampant
> To: heralds at lists.ansteorra.org
> Date: Thursday, August 18, 2011, 5:58 PM
> 
> Perhaps a link to a picture would help. Otherwise I agree
> with Daniel. Were this the old snarky days of commentary...
> 
> But I'll try: 
> Or, a winged natural panther segreant sable wings
> undercoated gules maintaining a sword argent on a bordure
> azure semy of pheons inverted Or.
> 
> 
> Complexity seven, or nine if maintained charges count for
> complexity but not difference.
> 
> No conflicts noticed.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tmcd at panix.com
> To: Heralds List, Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA,Inc. <heralds at lists.ansteorra.org>
> Sent: Thu, Aug 18, 2011 4:44 pm
> Subject: Re: [ANSTHRLD] conflict check - natural panther
> rampant
> 
> 
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2011, John Atkinson <johnmatkinson at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>  Ioannes
> 
>  On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 4:22 PM,  <tmcd at panix.com>
> wrote:
>  > On Thu, 18 Aug 2011, eirik at hot.rr.com
> wrote:
>  >> Or, a winged natural panther
> Rampant?  The CoA Glossary of Terms doesn't have a
> default posture for
> eneric felines.
> > >> sable maintaining in its front paws
>  >> a sword argent
> Low contrast, but I think that's OK for a maintained
> charge.
> > >> and on a bordure azure an orle of arrowheads
>  >> inverted Or.
>  >>
>  >> The underside of the wings is red if that is
> important.
>  >
>  > I can't think of a heraldic way of saying "winged
> where the
>  > undersides of the wings are gules and the top and
> leading edges of
>  > the wings are sable".
> 
>  Artistic detail, not blazoned?
> Adding wings is a CD.  For wings elevated, which I
> think is the
> efault for wings on a non-winged thing, most but not all of
> the wing
> hat you see is the underside.  That seems like way too
> much to call
> n artistic detail.
> Dannet de Lyncoln
> - 
> im McDaniel; Reply-To: tmcd at panix.com
> ______________________________________________
> eralds mailing list
> eralds at lists.ansteorra.org
> ttp://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/heralds-ansteorra.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Heralds mailing list
> Heralds at lists.ansteorra.org
> http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/heralds-ansteorra.org
> 



More information about the Heralds mailing list