[ANSTHRLD] conflict check - natural panther rampant

Ron eirik at hot.rr.com
Fri Aug 19 05:46:51 PDT 2011


I haven't seen the new design with the arrowheads yet, I went with the generic for now. Also, I have advised the submitter to clor the underside of the wing sable with white lines to show details.

Eirik

Sent from my Samsung smartphone on AT&T

Crandall <crandalltwo-scalists at yahoo.com> wrote:

>Pheons or Broadarrows? 
>
>Crandall
>
>
>"In all life one should comfort the afflicted, but verily, also, one should afflict the comfortable, and especially when they are comfortably, contentedly, even happily wrong." -John Kenneth Galbraith
>
>
>--- On Thu, 8/18/11, Kevinkeary <kevinkeary at aol.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Kevinkeary <kevinkeary at aol.com>
>> Subject: Re: [ANSTHRLD] conflict check - natural panther rampant
>> To: heralds at lists.ansteorra.org
>> Date: Thursday, August 18, 2011, 5:58 PM
>> 
>> Perhaps a link to a picture would help. Otherwise I agree
>> with Daniel. Were this the old snarky days of commentary...
>> 
>> But I'll try: 
>> Or, a winged natural panther segreant sable wings
>> undercoated gules maintaining a sword argent on a bordure
>> azure semy of pheons inverted Or.
>> 
>> 
>> Complexity seven, or nine if maintained charges count for
>> complexity but not difference.
>> 
>> No conflicts noticed.
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: tmcd at panix.com
>> To: Heralds List, Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA,Inc. <heralds at lists.ansteorra.org>
>> Sent: Thu, Aug 18, 2011 4:44 pm
>> Subject: Re: [ANSTHRLD] conflict check - natural panther
>> rampant
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, 18 Aug 2011, John Atkinson <johnmatkinson at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>  Ioannes
>> 
>>  On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 4:22 PM,  <tmcd at panix.com>
>> wrote:
>>  > On Thu, 18 Aug 2011, eirik at hot.rr.com
>> wrote:
>>  >> Or, a winged natural panther
>> Rampant?  The CoA Glossary of Terms doesn't have a
>> default posture for
>> eneric felines.
>> > >> sable maintaining in its front paws
>>  >> a sword argent
>> Low contrast, but I think that's OK for a maintained
>> charge.
>> > >> and on a bordure azure an orle of arrowheads
>>  >> inverted Or.
>>  >>
>>  >> The underside of the wings is red if that is
>> important.
>>  >
>>  > I can't think of a heraldic way of saying "winged
>> where the
>>  > undersides of the wings are gules and the top and
>> leading edges of
>>  > the wings are sable".
>> 
>>  Artistic detail, not blazoned?
>> Adding wings is a CD.  For wings elevated, which I
>> think is the
>> efault for wings on a non-winged thing, most but not all of
>> the wing
>> hat you see is the underside.  That seems like way too
>> much to call
>> n artistic detail.
>> Dannet de Lyncoln
>> - 
>> im McDaniel; Reply-To: tmcd at panix.com
>> ______________________________________________
>> eralds mailing list
>> eralds at lists.ansteorra.org
>> ttp://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/heralds-ansteorra.org
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Heralds mailing list
>> Heralds at lists.ansteorra.org
>> http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/heralds-ansteorra.org
>> 
>_______________________________________________
>Heralds mailing list
>Heralds at lists.ansteorra.org
>http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/heralds-ansteorra.org


More information about the Heralds mailing list