[ANSTHRLD] conflict check portcullis
vyolante at gmail.com
Mon Jan 24 14:33:33 PST 2011
- The following badge associated with this name was registered in
December of 2003 (via the
*(Fieldless <http://oanda.sca.org/glossary.cgi?p=fieldless>) An arched
door argent <http://oanda.sca.org/glossary.cgi?p=argent>.*
Theonis de Zeeuwe<http://oanda.sca.org/oanda_name.cgi?p=Theonis%20de%20Zeeuwe>
- The following device associated with this name was registered in August
of 2010 (via
*Argent <http://oanda.sca.org/glossary.cgi?p=argent>, three strikes
A strike is a CD from a portcullis
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Vyolante Oporto <vyolante at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the Heads up - Hadn't seen that part of the site before.
> That brought up a 112, I'll email again if I see something that gets close
> that I havent listed.
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Marie de Blois <erminespot at gmail.com>wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Vyolante Oporto <vyolante at gmail.com>
>> > Again, same disclaimer, still finding my way around cadency. It would
>> > probably help alot if you got anything for being chainless - in the
>> > chainless portcullis brought up no results.
>> Nope, no difference for having chains or not.
>> Also, if you are using the 'blazon pattern search' for doing conflict
>> checking, I cannot urge you enough to not do so. The Category Index
>> is the best approach to take, because it will combine things which are
>> considered the same for conflict (but blazoned differently) into a
>> single category. For example, Beast - Dog will include dogs, wolves,
>> foxes, talbots, greyhounds, and all the other variant terms which I
>> never remember all of (but it's quite a lot), whereas the blazon
>> pattern search will only get 'dog' or 'wolf'.
>> There are a few categories which blend things that do not conflict
>> (say, Tools), but they're relatively rare.
>> Heralds mailing list
>> Heralds at lists.ansteorra.org
More information about the Heralds