[ANSTHRLD] Submission Check please..
jpercer at gmail.com
Mon Feb 27 16:39:48 PST 2012
I'd be in favor of overturning the precedent if it were reproducible
from the blazon. That's going to be the test you'll need to meet, as
not only must the blazon describe it properly, but you have to know
what it looks like to draw it. Seems to me anyway.
Besides, everyone knows the English Way is supreme.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Ld. Albin Oil De Larrun
<albin_oil_de_larrun at yahoo.com> wrote:
> So what we are saying is, no matter what your nationality of your persona, do it the English Way?
> Grin... ( I have an English persona)
> If we changed it to a European crane, could it be "artistically" redrawn as one of the others on his shield?
> On Feb 27, 2012, at 6:23 PM, Joseph Percer <jpercer at gmail.com> wrote:
>> The only one that screams "crane" to me is #3... #1 looks almost peacockish
>> Andrewe, who concurs with Magnus that the cited ruling is pretty damning.
>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Doug Bell <magnus77840 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> You have to deal with this long standing ruling which may return all of the above the way they are drawn.
>>> [September 1994 LoAR, R-Ansteorra]
>>> Patrick Donovan of Warwick. Device. Per bend azure and argent, a bend sinister counterchanged between two Japanese cranes displayed in annulo gules.
>>> The Japanese crane displayed in annulo was returned for being not identifiable some time ago, having more in common with roundels and crescents than European renditions of birds.
>>> Heralds mailing list
>>> Heralds at lists.ansteorra.org
>> Joseph M. Percer, AAS, LP
>> Heralds mailing list
>> Heralds at lists.ansteorra.org
> Heralds mailing list
> Heralds at lists.ansteorra.org
Joseph M. Percer, AAS, LP
More information about the Heralds