[ANSTHRLD] Masonry - clarification

Marie de Blois erminespot at gmail.com
Thu Jun 28 09:43:48 PDT 2012


On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Tim McDaniel <tmcd at panix.com> wrote:
> Still in language lawyer mode, I can contemplate an "ermined" pale
> with three very large ermine spots or thick masoning with three
> bricks, so "more than four" can't apply.  Laurel might precedent that
> three of such ermine spots are charges,

I think this is what would happen.  Laurel's registered "N ermine
spot(s)" as enumerated charges often enough and "three charges on a
pale" is common enough that I can't imagine Laurel considering a pale
with three large ermine spots to be "ermine (of any variant)".

Marie



More information about the Heralds mailing list