[ANSTHRLD] Conflict Check: Or, on a pile gules a lion and a stag combatant counter-changed

[Bob Wade]

I believe you check a pile versus chaussé (and chaussé versus per chevron inverted), but not a pile versus per chevron inverted.

--- On Thu, 5/31/12, Tim McDaniel <tmcd at panix.com> wrote:


From: Tim McDaniel <tmcd at panix.com>
Subject: Re: [ANSTHRLD] Conflict Check: Or, on a pile gules a lion and a stag combatant counter-changed
To: "Heralds List, Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc." <heralds at lists.ansteorra.org>
Date: Thursday, May 31, 2012, 3:13 PM


On Thu, 31 May 2012, Bob Wade <logiosophia at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Note that "Or a pile gules and overall a lion and a stag combattant"
> has a conflict versus "Or, a pile gules" (Chandos [Important non-SCA
> arms], Device, Dec 1994). There's only 1 CD under the current rules
> for adding the overall charge group under RfS X.4c.
>
> "Per chevron inverted gules and Or, a lion and a stag combattant"
> seemed clear When I checked last month.

I believe that that would have the same conflict -- that a pile must
be also be checked as per chevron inverted, and if there's a conflict
under either blazon, it is returned ("you can't blazon your way out of
a conflict").

Daniel Lindocolina
-- 
Tim McDaniel, tmcd at panix.com
_______________________________________________
Heralds mailing list
Heralds at lists.ansteorra.org
http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/heralds-ansteorra.org