[ANSTHRLD] Conflict Double Check, Please?

[Steven Hall]

Ines:

Forgot to specify that I was looking for the default 2-1 arrangement. Yes,
that's precisely what I'm looking for. Thanks for the catch, and thanks for
the double check. ;) Also, I'll offer the "in pale" option as well, should
she be interested. (She *should* be on this list, for that matter ... lemme
poke her and do something about that.)

Still That Snorri Guy


On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 5:19 PM, S L Niemann <slniemann at gmail.com> wrote:

> Back to English to be clear since you said it has been a while :)
> left size purple, right side white, two turtles tergient above  (white on
> purple, and purple on white) and a third one below on the line split
> vertically white and purple.
>
> With turtles there are no fields per pale purpure and argent (or vice
> versa)
> Nor one with three turtles and nothing else.
> Also checking as
> Per pale purpure and argent in pale three turtles counterchanged (with all
> three in a line along the line of division half white and half purple)
>
> This appears clear in either iteration.
>
> Ines
>
> _______________________
> *Dum Spiritus, Spes
> *
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Steven Hall <gyronnygeek at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello all, it's that Snorri guy.
> >
> > I'm a little rusty on the Francois Method these days, so I'd like a
> > double-check on a blazon, please?
> >
> > Per pale purpure and argent, three turtles counterchanged.
> >
> > IIRC, default on turtles is tergiant, so that's unneeded in the blazon.
> > Best Gróa and I can figure, it's clear, but I wanted to be sure.
> >
> > As aforementioned,
> > That Snorri Guy
> > _______________________________________________
> > Heralds mailing list
> > Heralds at lists.ansteorra.org
> > http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/heralds-ansteorra.org
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Heralds mailing list
> Heralds at lists.ansteorra.org
> http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/heralds-ansteorra.org
>