[ANSTHRLD] Conflict check?

[Jennifer Smith]

As far as eradicated vs blasted and eradicated, that's right. But is
that calling conflict between brown/green and RED? Unless Rosamund's
tree isn't blazoned properly, it's a gules tree. Either it's an
incorrect blazon, or someone didn't catch that issue, or the tincture
issue wasn't discussed in the final decision.

-Emma

On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Tim McDaniel <tmcd at panix.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Mar 2013, Bob Wade <logiosophia at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> "[Argent, an oak tree eradicated proper and on a chief gules three
>> crosses of Toulouse Or.] ... However, it conflicts with Rosamund du
>>
>> Grasse, Argent, a willow tree blasted and eradicated, on a chief
>> gules two geese close respectant argent. There is not a CD for
>> changes to the tree, leaving a single CD for changes to the tertiary
>> charges on the chief. [Guilheumes de Garrigis, 10/05, R-An Tir]"
>> (Collected Precedents of Elizabeth at
>> http://heraldry.sca.org/laurel/precedents/elisabeth/armory.html
>
>
> Huh, worse than I thought!  Thank you for the precedent dive.
>
> Danielis de Lincolia
>
> --
> Tim McDaniel, tmcd at panix.com
> _______________________________________________
> Heralds mailing list
> Heralds at lists.ansteorra.org
> http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/heralds-ansteorra.org