HERB - Re: Culpepper and beginning period books
Joan Nicholson
gryphon at carlsbadnm.com
Sun Aug 29 07:19:28 PDT 1999
Greetings Rauthulfr,
Are any of these, particularly the Markham & Turner, currently in Print?
If so, where?
Thanks,
Prydwen
At 08:42 PM 8/28/1999 -0700, you wrote:
>I think I'm confused, but I assure you I am not offended. Of the books I
>mentioned: Banckes was published in period. Markham's The English
>Housewife was published in period. Turner's works were published in
>period. Gerard's The Herbal, and Thomas Johnson's edited edition of
>Gerard's Herbal were both published in period. Some of Culpeper's works was
>published were published in period, and his English Physician was published
>in 1652 which should be close enough for anybody. By any standard of
>measure they HAVE to be "historically accurate". they were written by
>people who lived then, therefor they cannot but be accepted as such.
>
>This is not to say that they have the same merit as herbals by modern
>standards or by period ones. Banckes herbal is in essence the last popular
>herbal in the Medieval tradition. Turners work is in essence the first
>Renaissance herbal in English (The Grete Herbal comes close but is in
>essence a translation rather than an original work.) (Yeah, that picks nits
>but they are hopefully the sort of nits worthy of discussion rather than
>authenticity nazi stuff.)
>
gryphon at carlsbadnm.com
============================================================================
Go to http://lists.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.
More information about the Herbalist
mailing list