<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><SPAN class=089061223-26042004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>Yeah. What Donnchadh said.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> namron-bounces@ansteorra.org
[mailto:namron-bounces@ansteorra.org]<B>On Behalf Of
</B>Donnchadh<BR><B>Sent:</B> Monday, April 26, 2004 11:15 AM<BR><B>To:</B>
Grimmie; Barony of Namron<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Namron] Excessive
replies<BR><BR></FONT></DIV><FONT size=2>I have to agree with Grimmie here.
<BR><BR>So long as the new message is at the top, then it doesn't cause any
extra work for the reader. If you don't need the rest of the
conversation, just ignore what is below the sig. On the other hand, it
makes it very convienent for some readers to have the full thread of the
conversation. I also feel that it is much easier to take things out of
context when selecting little snipets to quote. If people are putting
their comments at the bottom of the thread, or their sig is at the bottom of
the thread where you have to scroll through the entire thing just to make sure
you've read everything, then I can understand the frustration. But in
that case, I feel that the solution is to put anything new (including the sig)
at the top of the message, not deleting the rest of the conversation.
<BR><BR>And yes, I realize that I am doing right now exactly what Ulf is
talking about. I'm not doing it out of spite, lazyness, or because I
haven't given it any thought. I'm doing it this way because a really
think this is the proper way to do things. <BR><BR><BR>Respectfully,
<BR>Donnchadh Beag mac Griogair <BR>Barony of Namron <BR>Honorable Brotherhood
of Brewers, Mazers, and Vintners <BR><BR>-- <BR>Open WebMail Project (<A
href="http://openwebmail.org/" target=_blank>http://openwebmail.org</A>)
<BR><BR><BR><B>---------- Original Message -----------</B> <BR>From: "Grimmie"
<ldgrimhun@cox.net> <BR>To: "Barony of Namron"
<namron@ansteorra.org> <BR>Sent: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 10:36:21 -0500
<BR>Subject: Re: [Namron] Excessive replies <BR><BR>> I hate some to send a
message and I have to go look <BR>> for the email that they are referencing
to see what they <BR>> are talking about. I do not save email list
postings so <BR>> I have to go to the website to see what they are talking
<BR>> about or I ignore the email because they deleted <BR>> the quote
of the email they are replying to. That is <BR>> what a reply is for.
Set your email program to put <BR>> your post at the top not bottom.
<BR>> Ron Dawdy <BR>> Grimhun <BR>> <BR>> ----- Original Message
----- <BR>> From: "Ulf Gunnarsson" <ulfie@cox.net> <BR>> To:
<namron@ansteorra.org> <BR>> Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 2:14 AM
<BR>> Subject: [Namron] Excessive replies <BR>> <BR>> > 190
messages in the last two weeks. Don't you people watch TV or <BR>>
> something? <BR>> > <BR>> > As I stated at populace meeting, I
have no authority on this mailing <BR>> > list (must be the green
kryptonite...) But it is polite to TRIM <BR>> > messages when
replying, especially the mailing list stuff that show up <BR>> > at the
bottom of each message. I also consider it a good thing to trim <BR>>
> out the reply to the reply to the reply... except where such addition is
<BR>> > necessary to the argument or content of YOUR message. <BR>>
> <BR>> > One of you has (successfully) argued with me that it is
necessary <BR>> > sometimes to keep not just one level back but possible
more of the <BR>> > previous levels of replies in order for the message
to be understood. <BR>> > The majority of the items in the past two
weeks where this has been done <BR>> > really didn't fall into that
category. <BR>> > <BR>> > Be kind. Please trim the crap off
the end of things you reply to. Leave <BR>> > out unnecessary replies to
replies. And remember that this list serves <BR>> > as a window
from the modern world to our Society and our Barony. A <BR>> >
little ki-i-i-i-dding is funny, but let's not let it get to the point <BR>>
> that we need an Adult Verification System to sign up for the list.
<BR>> > Please? <BR>> > <BR>> > I am also going to irritate
a few people in a few minutes. I made a <BR>> > list of everyone
that replied to a reply to a messages, or replies to <BR>> > those, or
etc... that did NOT trim the old stuff out. Why? Because I
<BR>> > used to be a herald, and we make lists of things. Twenty people
did at <BR>> > least a reply to a reply without trimming it up.
Ten did it at least <BR>> > three times. There were two
people that had SIX layers of replies in <BR>> > their message. <BR>>
> <BR>> > I am sending an email to seven people who did it at least
four times in <BR>> > the past two weeks. Most are good friends of
mine. Sorry, guys, love <BR>> > you but... things have gotten
excessive. Take this as advice, 'kay? <BR>> > <BR>> > Baron
Ulf <BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> >
_______________________________________________ <BR>> > Namron mailing
list <BR>> > Namron@ansteorra.org <BR>> > <A
href="http://www.ansteorra.org/mailman/listinfo/namron"
target=_blank>http://www.ansteorra.org/mailman/listinfo/namron</A> <BR>>
_______________________________________________ <BR>> Namron mailing list
<BR>> Namron@ansteorra.org <BR>> <A
href="http://www.ansteorra.org/mailman/listinfo/namron"
target=_blank>http://www.ansteorra.org/mailman/listinfo/namron</A>
<BR><B>------- End of Original Message -------</B>
<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></BODY></HTML>