<div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div link="blue" vlink="purple" lang="EN-US"><div><p><font color="navy" face="Arial" size="2">
<span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: navy;">Would you like to see a recent
letter to me from the President of the SCA showing where the SCA has to comply <span>to</span> the A.D.A.?</span></font></p></div></div></blockquote><div>You just posted it, so we've all seen it now.<br><br>You were obviously dissatisfied with Protectorate and Camp Cimarron. Did you contact the Society Seneschal about it? What was his response?
<br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div link="blue" vlink="purple" lang="EN-US"><div><p><font color="navy" face="Arial" size="2">
<span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: navy;">I had rather take it <span>offlist</span> since I
am limited to small responses or await the Moderators to clear or delete it at
their leisure.</span></font></p></div></div></blockquote><div>I disagree. I have this bad habit of turning the lights on and seeing what's going on in the dark. I've found that much of the SCA's business should be conducted in the bright light of a public forum. Kinda hard for private letters from corporate officers to get missed when you do that.
<br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div link="blue" vlink="purple" lang="EN-US"><div><p><font color="navy" face="Wingdings" size="2">
<span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Wingdings; color: navy;"><span></span></span></font><font color="navy" face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: navy;">Then when you do get it I do
expect a response on list from you.</span></font></p><span class="q"></span></div></div></blockquote></div>I don't need to wait. Here's your response now.<br><br>So, Chass, what do we need to do? Are we going to restrict future events to sites that are ADA compliant? How compliant do they have to be? Do we have to use a site like Roman Nose, even though it's too far outside of our Barony and we're not going to get a good turnout by using it (and, by the way, we're going to lose money in the process)? Does compliance then equal a position where we have to lose money on every event, or can we have *some* events at sites that aren't compliant but fit much better financially and in terms of what we need to accomplish (equestrian champs, etc.)? And when we run out of money, does the compliance issue still matter?
<br><br>When does compliance become a suicide pact for the Barony?<br><br>Care,<br>Bubba<br><br>