NR - Re: NR Warlord vs. Tribute

[Epperson, Sheryl]

Actually, I also think moving Tribute may be a good idea.
Personally, I have been finding the focus on war practice, while
understandable just before the war, to be detracting from the purpose of the
event.  I personally would like to have Tribute go back to being primarily
for fun, and fundraising.  If it is desired to have a regional war practice
just before the war, I think it should be separate from Tribute, not part of
it.  
Also, again personally, if it is primarily a fundraising/A&S event, I don't
think that it necessarily needs to be indoors.  But I take the heat well,
others don't

Annabelle Fitzsimmons

-----Original Message-----
From: Deborah Sweet/soc/cas/Okstate [mailto:dssweet at okstate.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 10:39 AM
To: Northern at ansteorra.org
Subject: NR - Re: NR Warlord vs. Tribute

<snip>
Fourth - The northern region should have two events, separated by
approximately six months (in separate reigns). The first event, in February
would be the Northern War College & Warlord event. In August would be the
Northern Tribute to Ansteorra, held not at a camping site, but at a fully
(even frigidly) air conditioned facility (though I suppose if there was a
camping facility that did have an air-conditioned hall.....)  Most of the
events at Tribute lend themselves more to an indoors site rather than an
outdoors one. However, I don't really anticipate anyone else agreeing with
me on this idea, and that doesn't really bother me. It just seems the more
logical way of holding the events.

HL Estrill Swet
Mooneschadoweshire


============================================================================
Go to http://lists.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.
============================================================================
Go to http://lists.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.