NR - Principality

[Merrik Viltar Har]

> Robert Fitzmorgan eloquently said allot more than is here;
>     You said that  "Kingdom\Principality equals 6 of one, half a dozen of
the
> other"  I don't agree, they are very different things.  I think we could
be a
> principality now if we had the will to do so.  I am not at all convinced
that
> the Northern region can support a stable membership of 600+.

Excellant point, that is why, for the purpose of these discussions,
King\Prin is a 6\halfdoz type thing.  It would be a difficult road to
Principality, but with the membership we now have, the "only" logical
proccess of change would mean Principality first, Kingdom later, and that
would be an even more difficult road, but I believe life is richer when you
travel the more diffucult roads.

>     I agree.  We CAN accomplish a lot.  What we should be discussing now,
in
> my opinion, is what do we want to accomplish and how do we go about
> accomplishing it.  I think the discussion about whether we can or can't
> support a kingdom can wait till after we see if there is any support for a
> principality.

Again Excellent point, but if you believe you can't, you probably can't, if
you believe you can, then you stand a much better chance of success, so "I"
think the discussion about whether we can or can't is mute, cause obviously
with members such as yourself and the other 110, lurkers, out of region, out
of kingdom, bored, and just crazy, who have shown interest these last few
days.

Merrik


============================================================================
Go to http://lists.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.