NR - Principality name

[Chris Backus]

I think the best way is to just talk about it as much as practical off
line as well as online.  If the off line folk are at roughly the same
point in the discussion as the online folk, there will be less chance
of them feeling behind, divorced from the process, and becoming
opposed due to that.

Let's talk it up at practices and meetings.

Hawkins

----- Original Message -----
From: "Deborah Sweet/soc/cas/Okstate" <dssweet at okstate.edu>
To: <northern at ansteorra.org>
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: NR - Principality name


>
> >I think that Pug brought up a big potential downfall and that's to
> >discuss this in great depth online will marginalize off-line
populace
> >and make them feel that they're being left out.  We might make them
> >uncomfortable about a concept that they no longer feel that they
can
> >buy into.  I think we should avoid that by not even thinking about
> >making decisions here.  Coming up with ideas is fine, but we need
to
> >remember that those won't be the only ideas and keep an open mind.
> >
> >Hawkins
>
> So how is the best way to take this conversation to our off-line
folks
> without causing it to seem like a conspiracy of the On-Line
> Pro-principality nerds?
>
> Should the assembled responsible people (the landed b/b & the
seneschals)
> take the lead in bringing this up? Or everyone who's interested? Or
what?
>
> Estrill
> who wants to go, go, go on this but knows we've got to take it slow,
slow,
> slow


============================================================================
Go to http://lists.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.