[NR] [Namron] Regional Naming Meeting at Protectorate

[ksullivan6 at cox.net]

On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Doug Copley wrote:

> hmmmm, not even close to what they said. There have been many posts
(about 224 over a 1 month period and 35 of those where not about name 
suggestions or discussion)
on here about submitting names and making comments and a website created 
just for that purpose.
( 56 names on website, suggested by 14 people, last 1 added on 9/22)
Many people (60 out of over 500 paid members in the northern region, out 
of those 60,10 people are responsible for ½ of the posts)
have been making posts and discussion here on line. They also stated 
specifically that any group can get together at any time that they 
choose to discuss pros and cons and names. What they stated was that at 
this EARLY point in the discussions they do not want take away from the 
an event that has been planned for months and scheduled and worked on to 
just make changes and take people away for a discussion.
(Shouldn’t the people be allowed to make that decision for themselves?
Naming of this region deserves the time, and those who cannot make it on 
fri nights also deserve to be heard in person, not just email )
the items in ( ) are mine. Just out of curiosity how many people have 
attended the 2 meetings that have been held so far?
Misstress Alix Tiberga
>
> YIS, Vincenti
> On 10/8/2010 3:51 PM, ksullivan6 at cox.net wrote:
>> So, your Excellencys are saying that unless a person can make a 
>> Friday evening meeting their opion does not count. If the naming of 
>> the Northern region is important enough, then it should be important 
>> enough to take time to talk about it in the Daylight hours on 
>> Saturdays of events. If we are not willing enough to take part of our 
>> Sat. for this then maybe we are not ready for this step. Mistress 
>> Alix Tiberga
>>
>> Work hard,keep the ceremonies,live peaceably, and unite your hearts. 
>> (Hopi)
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Daniel Pupek wrote:
>>> Her excellency and i see no problem with informal discussions of 
>>> this sort. Since these meetings are informal and unofficial, evening 
>>> meetings would be more appropriate. Daytime meetings would neglect 
>>> the vast majority of those who attend our events to participate in 
>>> daytime activities.
>>> No one person or group is spearheading this effort. Unfortunately, 
>>> that sometimes means short notice. That also means you can hold your 
>>> own discussions. What's important is that these discussions are open 
>>> to everyone. Soon, everyone will coalesce around a few ideas and we 
>>> can begin more formal discussions.
>>> So, please have discussions but let's keep in mind that they are 
>>> still informal and should not interfere with the event. Also, we 
>>> will not be able to attend since we have event obligations.
>>> HE Orlando
>>> On Friday, October 8, 2010, Jolene Graves <meraud90 at yahoo.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> I would like to take part in these meetings. Friday night at 10PM 
>>>> is a very bad time for me. For one thing I will not be camping. For 
>>>> another I have young children that need to be in bed at that time 
>>>> and I have no time to arrange a baby sitter. Would it be possible 
>>>> that a meeting be planned more than 3 days before an event? With 
>>>> adequate notice I could arrange childcare if necessary. . I know 
>>>> there are a lot of activities scheduled at every event, but if one 
>>>> of these meetings could be help sometime on a Saturday we would 
>>>> have greater participation in this process.
>>>> H.L. Meraud de Dun Carraig
>>>> Act well you part, there all the honour lays.
>>>>
> _______________________________________________ Northern mailing list 
> Northern at lists.ansteorra.org 
> http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/northern-ansteorra.org