[NR] Results from the NORTHERN REGIONAL NAMING SURVEY

[Marc Carlson]

I wouldn't mind seeing the raw data as well.  It's not that I don't trust you -- but I know I didn't vote for any of these (whether I factually did or not is irrelevant, deep inside I "know" I didn't).

Some thoughts:

1.  We're never going to come up with a name that represents everyone's area of interest, that's just a given.  Pick one and move on.

2.  It doesn't matter how it's *supposed* to be pronounced or spelled.  In ten years, it *will*  be pronounced as it's spelled, or else have developed a pronunciation that falls totally outside how it was written.

M/d

> From: deborah.s.sweet at okstate.edu
> To: northern at lists.ansteorra.org
> Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 09:03:00 -0500
> Subject: Re: [NR] Results from the NORTHERN REGIONAL NAMING SURVEY
> 
> >> This allows us to take out the names that people did not believe would
> >> represent us and move forward with the names that could represent the people
> >> in the region.  The list is much shorter now so we need to talk about it
> >> amongst ourselves and those that would like to be involved.  The remaining
> >> list of names are made up of those that had less that 30% dislike and
> >> greater than 40% like in the survey.
> 
> >The list was VERY Long, over 60. Can we have the top 10 to 20?
> 
> 
> Personally I would prefer to see the results of the ENTIRE list of names.
> 
> Because really, I only chose a few names that I really really liked, and disliked a few names (really really disliked). Most of the names on the list while they didn't "float my boat" I could probably end up living with.
> 
> So let's see the results of the entire list please.
> 
> Estrill
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Northern mailing list
> Northern at lists.ansteorra.org
> http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/northern-ansteorra.org