[Northkeep] principality
marc-carlson at utulsa.edu
marc-carlson at utulsa.edu
Fri Jul 6 09:10:54 PDT 2001
>From: "Susan Pettey" <susanpettey at msn.com>
>That is where I was confused. If this had been formal then, if I understand
>correctly what I read in Corpora, only paid members would have counted and
>it would have been a majority of paid members not just a majority of those
>that voted. So in effect those who do not vote are presumed to have voted
>no, whether that presumption is correct or incorrect. The majority of paid
>members must vote yes for the Kingdom Seneschal to even consider a petition
>for Principality status.
>
>Am I understanding this correctly, Marc?
I believe so. Had this been a formal thing, then only the paid members would
have counted - of course that would have only been a 152 out of 343 (or 44%,
of whom an unknown number said "yes").
Marc/Diarmaid
More information about the Northkeep
mailing list