[Northkeep] Reincarnation...M H lives again

[Susan Pettey]

Thank you Mercedes.  Maybe I should have made my question clearer.  That is
what I was asking.  Thanks again.


>From: Stephanie Drake <steldr at home.net>
>Reply-To: northkeep at ansteorra.org
>To: northkeep at ansteorra.org
>Subject: Re: [Northkeep] Reincarnation...M H lives again
>Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 11:20:42 -0500
>
>Well, right now he is the list admin so it is his job...............
>
>Mercedes
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Susan Pettey <susanpettey at msn.com>
>To: <northkeep at ansteorra.org>
>Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 11:15 AM
>Subject: RE: [Northkeep] Reincarnation...M H lives again
>
>
> > Actually when asking if the list was monitored for email etiquitte I was
> > replying to the following message sent by you.  It appears that you are
> > chastising both Angus and Maidenhair for improper email etiquitte.  With
> > your final line being "Don't make me have to do this job".
> >
> > I took Angus' post as a notice to everyone who blocked Maidenhair's
>email
> > addys that one more was "missed" by all.
> >
> > Maybe everyone is being a little "sesitive" with everything that has
> > happened?
> >
> > "
> > Angus, if you want to block her stuff, you are encouraged to do so.
> > Unlike
> > many people, I even think it's appropriate to TELL people you are
>blocking
> > them (since
> > otherwise they may not get the clue).  But I have to tell you that she's
> > been posting from
> > multiple email addresses all along.  Just because -you- missed one may
>not
> > be reason
> > enough to jump her shit. I don't expect you to know this, since you are
> > filtering her (and
> > probably others as well), but things have been pretty quiet for several
> > days now.  So
> > your message has the effect of looking like a knee-jerk response over
> > nothing (which is,
> > the last time I checked, poor netiquette).
> >
> > Maidenhair, remember _think_ then post.  A general rule is that if he's
> > really filtering
> > you, you are wasting your time.  If he's not really filtering you and
>you
> > respond to him, you're
> > just going to encourage him.  And you see what I just said about a
> > knee-jerk response?
> > Same thing.
> >
> > This is how -unpleasantness- starts, and I don't think that any of us
> > wants that.
> > If nothing else, -unpleasantness- leads to more garbage messages that
> > people just have to
> > delete.
> >
> > (Don't make me have to do this job :)  )
> > "
> >
> >
> > >From: Marc Carlson <marc-carlson at utulsa.edu>
> > >Reply-To: northkeep at ansteorra.org
> > >To: northkeep at ansteorra.org
> > >Subject: RE: [Northkeep] Reincarnation...M H lives again
> > >Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 11:06:41 -0500
> > >
> > >At 10:50 AM 6/28/01 -0500, Susan wrote:
> > > >>So this list is still being monitored for proper email etiquitte?
> > >
> > >This list has never been "monitored", other than by the membership.
> > >Since Angus chose to criticize Maidenhair's net etiquette, then I
>suppose
> > >that means that yes, he's monitoring the list for proper email
>etiquette.
> > >
> > >D/M
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >Northkeep mailing list
> > >Northkeep at ansteorra.org
> > >http://www.ansteorra.org/mailman/listinfo/northkeep
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Northkeep mailing list
> > Northkeep at ansteorra.org
> > http://www.ansteorra.org/mailman/listinfo/northkeep
>_______________________________________________
>Northkeep mailing list
>Northkeep at ansteorra.org
>http://www.ansteorra.org/mailman/listinfo/northkeep

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com