[Northkeep] application rejected ??

[ld.blackmoon]

greetings

no problems .
> I have spoken plainly and openly. As soon as a
> question about the office of the Archery Marshal was posed by you, you,
saw
> exactly the answer we offered.
yes , and i had no problems with your answer , everything after that has
just been an open discussion / debate with m/d.

>I have no idea why I keep putting Robert on these emails... I really did
mean to write Arthur.

Weird, I must be distracted or something.

Sorry to Arthur and everyone.

Kindly,
Ian

no apology needed, when you know more than one name for a person , it can
easily get confused , as they are kind of interchangeable.

be safe, be happy, have fun
arthur blackmoon

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jerry and Teresa Herring" <j.t.herring at sbcglobal.net>
To: "The Barony of Northkeep" <northkeep at lists.ansteorra.org>
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 5:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Northkeep] application rejected ??


> Robert,
> Regardless of all the dictionary talk...there is nothing slick or secret
or
> sneaky going on here. I have spoken plainly and openly. As soon as a
> question about the office of the Archery Marshal was posed by you, you,
saw
> exactly the answer we offered. We are going to try to speak to the NR this
> weekend, since this is his event. I am thinking there should be no
problems
> after speaking with the Regional in making a decision...but that is up to
> Michael.
>
> kindly,
> Ian
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "ld.blackmoon" <ld.blackmoon at cox.net>
> To: "The Barony of Northkeep" <northkeep at lists.ansteorra.org>
> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 5:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [Northkeep] application rejected ??
>
>
> > greetings
> >
> >>> Slick, as in (to quote from the big old book of words):
> >>
> >> "   4. Adroit, deft, quick, smart; skilful in action or execution. Also
> >> (merging with sense 3), glibly clever, having easy assurance. (Of
> > persons.)
> >>     5. First-class, excellent; neat, in good order; smart, efficient,
> >> that
> >> operates smoothly; superficially attractive, glibly clever. (Of things,
> >> actions, etc.) "
> >
> > well i guess i must be pretty sticky then, cause i figure it's much
> > simpler
> > to just say what i mean , think , or feel .
> > acording to the above definition , the only thing about me that might
fit
> > is
> > my missile skills . (Adroit,quick,skilful in action or execution, having
> > easy assurance,First-class. )
> > ( yes , i'm proud of my missle skills )
> >
> >> In other words, sometimes talking about things that are not ready
talked
> >> about publically isn't usually the smart thing to do.  It's not so much
> >> keeping secrets as it is about not doing things that might make people
> > draw
> >> conclusions you don't want them to draw.
> >
> > so why isn't talking about an office that has been vacant for months "
not
> > readily talked about publicly "
> > as of the first posting , i was unaware that anyone else had applied for
> > the
> > position .
> > so what wrong conclusions could have come from simply stating that
another
> > application had been filed , and that the delay was due to processing
the
> > extra applications ?
> > having been northern regional , there is usualy no other reason for a
> > delay
> > in the process, as unless an applicant is from out of kingdom , the
local
> > group and the regional are already familiar with the applicants , their
> > knowledge,dedication, skill level , etc .
> >
> > be safe, be happy, have fun
> > arthur blackmoon
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Marc Carlson" <marccarlson20 at hotmail.com>
> > To: <northkeep at lists.ansteorra.org>
> > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 3:00 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Northkeep] application rejected ??
> >
> >
> >> >From: "ld.blackmoon" <ld.blackmoon at cox.net>
> >> >ok, now i'm confused ?
> >> >did we switch topics ??
> >> >>>I really don't think there's any -secrecy-, just that some things
are
> >> >>>less slick than others.
> >> >are we discussing lubricants now ??
> >> > > just that some things are less
> >> > > slick than others.
> >> >sorry i don't catch the reference .
> >>
> >> I know *I* didn't change subjects...
> >>
> >> Slick, as in (to quote from the big old book of words):
> >>
> >> "   4. Adroit, deft, quick, smart; skilful in action or execution. Also
> >> (merging with sense 3), glibly clever, having easy assurance. (Of
> > persons.)
> >>     5. First-class, excellent; neat, in good order; smart, efficient,
> >> that
> >> operates smoothly; superficially attractive, glibly clever. (Of things,
> >> actions, etc.) "
> >>
> >> In other words, sometimes talking about things that are not ready
talked
> >> about publically isn't usually the smart thing to do.  It's not so much
> >> keeping secrets as it is about not doing things that might make people
> > draw
> >> conclusions you don't want them to draw.
> >>
> >> Does that make more sense?
> >>
> >> M/D
> >>
> >> _________________________________________________________________
> >> PC Magazine's 2007 editors' choice for best Web mail-award-winning
> >> Windows
> >> Live Hotmail.
> >>
> >
http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_mini_pcmag_0507
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> > ----
> >
> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Northkeep mailing list
> >> Northkeep at lists.ansteorra.org
> >> http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/northkeep-ansteorra.org
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Northkeep mailing list
> > Northkeep at lists.ansteorra.org
> > http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/northkeep-ansteorra.org
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Northkeep mailing list
> Northkeep at lists.ansteorra.org
> http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/northkeep-ansteorra.org