No subject

Consort-ium?


--- ravenrux at cox.net wrote:
> You know, if this wasn't the SCA, I would worry
> about that statement.
>
> Masamune
>
> From: "BlakHawk" <blakhawk at cjb.net>
> Date: 2003/04/17 Thu AM 11:17:59 EDT
> To: <northkeep at ansteorra.org>
> Subject: Re: [Northkeep] Crown and Queen
>
> Since she is not quite 13 yet I think it would be
> Consorts-R-Us...
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Fitzmorgan at aol.com>
> To: <northkeep at ansteorra.org>
> Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 10:11 AM
> Subject: Re: [Northkeep] Crown and Queen
>
>
> > --
> > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> > In a message dated 4/17/2003 9:47:28 AM Central
> Standard Time,
> > blakhawk at cjb.net writes:
> >
> >
> > > I have a Daughter that you could lease for the
> term of your Reign... :)
> > >
> >
> > Consorts-R-Us?  Or would that be Rent-A-Consort?
> >
> > Robert
> > _______________________________________________
> > Northkeep mailing list
> > Northkeep at ansteorra.org
> >
> http://www.ansteorra.org/mailman/listinfo/northkeep
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Northkeep mailing list
> Northkeep at ansteorra.org
> http://www.ansteorra.org/mailman/listinfo/northkeep
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Northkeep mailing list
> Northkeep at ansteorra.org
> http://www.ansteorra.org/mailman/listinfo/northkeep


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo
http://search.yahoo.com